2012/10/21 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > >>> I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation. That should be >>> unproblematic. >> >> The only reaction to that was a mail from Francisco which did not much >> to address this part of my plan. >> >> I did this right now, and afterwards discovered that there is a branch >> translation-staging. It is obvious that I suffer from a case of having >> not kept track of how translations are actually organized, so it may be >> possible that someone would need to hand-advance translation-staging to >> match translation, assuming that the organization of >> translation/translation-staging is similar to master/staging with regard >> to automatic testing. >> >> Ugh. Sorry for that. With the apparent lack of >> replies/comments/interest (possibly due to the translation list just >> downing any contribution from non-list-members), I felt I needed to move >> ahead in _some_ manner. > > Ok, it would appear that translation had been ahead translation-staging > already before my merge, so it seems I should take no guesses here and > just let people who actually know what translation-staging is for deal > with it.
I think translation-staging is an just experiment from John which he did not publicly announce. Or I don't remember it. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
