2012/11/12 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >> The fundamental question for an user (and he thinks it is for all new >> users, too) was to realize that lilypond is a programming >> language. Every syntax is more or less complex, and it would be >> useless to question it without a big amount of judgement elements. > > But LilyPond should rather be a music description language.
I think it is intended to mean more like "a language" as opposed to everything else which is not "a language" >> 2 Something especially difficult or hard to read or to write? >> >> Putting several voices together looks scary to use. > > In what respect "putting several voices together"? Multi-voice staves, I think. Polyphony in the lilypond sense of the word. >> It would be fine to specify properties as a series of dot-separated >> list of symbols. > > I guess we are ahead on this one. Yes, this is great. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
