----- Original Message -----
From: "David Kastrup" <[email protected]>
To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)
"Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> writes:
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)
Just one comment, otherwise LGTM
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2198
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2198: \relative c'' {
No. \relative must be applied to the music
in a constant sequence, not to a sequence that
might change depending on the tags.
https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/
I think it might actually be worth a comment to that effect with this
example? "Note where the \relative statement is placed..."
Don't think so. Notation manual is a reference manual. Information
like that belongs to \relative. It would be a different matter in the
Learning Manual.
Seems relevant to tagging, too?
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
