----- Original Message -----
From: "David Kastrup" <[email protected]>
To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)
"Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> writes:
https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/
I think it might actually be worth a comment to that effect with this
example? "Note where the \relative statement is placed..."
Don't think so. Notation manual is a reference manual. Information
like that belongs to \relative. It would be a different matter in the
Learning Manual.
Seems relevant to tagging, too?
That's why the section with tagging already contains
Known issues and warnings
Calling \relative on a music expression obtained by filtering music
through \keepWithTag or \removeWithTag might cause the octave relations
to change, as only the pitches actually remaining in the filtered
expression will be considered. Applying \relative first, before
\keepWithTag or \removeWithTag, avoids this danger as \relative then
acts on all the pitches as-input.
It's a fair cop.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
