Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > Am 16.12.2013 04:15, schrieb Graham Percival: >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 01:57:23PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote: >>> Am 12.12.2013 04:19, schrieb Graham Percival: >>>> ok. I also like the "applicances" tab, although I agree with you >>>> that the name might be ideal (but I also can't think of a better >>>> name right now). >>> Just a bunch of ideas: >>> We're talking about >>> - Applications of LilyPond >>> - Use of LilyPond in different contexts >>> - "Abusing" LiylPond >>> - integrating LilyPond in other tools >>> - making LilyPond part of something else >>> - using LilyPond as an engine for other tools >>> >>> Does this trigger any ideas for a menu/page title with anybody? >> If this was aimed at programmers, I'd be tempted to call it >> "Integration" or "Library", but those would not be clear to 95%+ >> of people reading the introduction. Hmm... I have a slight >> preference for "applications" rather than "appliances"; as a >> native speaker, I think "appliances" as being things like the >> fridges, ovens, or washing machines. > > As said in another reply I have the impression that "Applications" is > what the majority of commenters would suggest. Although I've got two > "votes" for "Other uses", which might also be quite telling when seen > as a menu item.
It's more like "Internal Use". Possibly "Integration" or "Embedding". I'm just floating a few words, it's not like any of them has quite the right "ring" to me, either. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
