On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 01:01:11 -0700, <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
pushed as c73b41b3e7be6d7280c6336cf03610cd7aed3000 - thanks for review! I'll post a follow-up patch later today. https://codereview.appspot.com/108110044/
It seems that after this patch, the old well-tested Devnull context should do everything that the new NullVoice does, without the complications and remaining problems. Do you also expect this to be true? If you understand the full purpose of NullVoice and can check that Devnull fills the need, you might create a patch to make NullVoice a simple alias for Devnull (and reverse any patches related to NullVoice that we wouldn't otherwise want in the code). _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
