On 2014/08/07 19:40:37, janek wrote:
2014-08-02 20:51 GMT+02:00 <mailto:[email protected]>: > Looks good. Looking at the name grob::copy-property-from-event, I
think
> that grob::property-from-event is shorter but probably equally > descriptive. Though perhaps we have a number of others starting
with
> copy- already. > > Your call.
Ok. I'll change it to grob::property-from-event when pushing, if you don't mind.
thanks! Janek
Oh phooey. Rethinking this, what about just grob::event-property and (eventually) grob::parent-property ? The grob:: makes clear that we are starting from a grob, and the xxx-property makes clear where we are ultimately looking. We don't really need more than that in the name, do we? Sorry for being late again with this proposal... https://codereview.appspot.com/122750044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
