Hi David, 2014-08-08 16:48 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>: > But then probably grob::from-event-property might be less jumbled,
I'm ok with this one. > and possibly > grob::event-property-getter might bring the callback nature better > across. I don't like this one. Maybe it's insufficient LilyPond knowledge on my side, but if i had seen grob::event-property-getter in the code i wouldn't know for sure what it does. I think grob::from-event-property would be more self-explanatory for me. > Of course, this reeks of wanting to become a whole naming convention at > one point of time. Should we run this through another discussion cycle > with the strong premise that the naming chosen here might, at a later > point of time, be adopted for all similar callback generators? No problem :-) I'm not at rush with this change at all, and i don't have waiting patches that depend on it, so take the time. Actually, feel free to take ownership of the issue if you'd like so. I've set the tracker issue to review. best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
