> If that was the focus of LilyPond, we > would talk to it in MusicXML. Hmm, I think there is a serious need to puncture the MusicXML bubble - it is an appalling hotchpotch quite unsuited to representing typeset music. From a casual look it seems to have been designed, but in fact the real definition is the output of a proprietary program. But, I do take your point, that LilyPond is intended to be written and read by humans. It is designing for both the write and the read to be easy that is tricky.
Richard _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
