> On 10 Nov 2014, at 16:50, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hans Aberg <[email protected]> writes: > >>> On 10 Nov 2014, at 00:31, Peter Chubb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> It's a bit presumptuous of me to comment on code I know little >>>> about, but it occurs to me that if it were that simple, it probably >>>> would have been done that way in the first place. >>> >>> I wrote the original --- I hadn't thought that it would be this >>> simple! >> >> Have you considered making a version where the ornaments can be >> expanded and typeset, rather than just affecting the MIDI output file? >> >> Apart from inspecting what is written to the MIDI output, one would >> then be able to make an expanded score. > > articulate does not work using engravers. It transforms a music > expression. It has no idea whether you will use the result for Midi or > Layout. > > So it would be close to impossible to _not_ have it work for Layout as > well as Midi. > > Have you ever tried it?
Personally, I do not use it, because it does not expand as expected in the musical context I write ornaments. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
