Joram <joram.no...@gmx.de> writes:
> Hi David,
>
> hm. So, this << { } { } >> can be used to combine notes into a chord,
> except that it is not real chord but just notes at the same point in
> time in the same voice.
What do you think a chord is? It is just notes at the same point in
time in the same voice.
> Which looks like a chord and (from the music point of view) is a chord
> (what else?) but isn't (at least for LP)? Or is it a real chord?
Why wouldn't it be a chord?
> In any case, ties in the example are then outside the chord (which makes
> sense for single notes), but multiple ties at the same time are then too
> much.
Multiple ties _outside_ the chord at the same time are too much.
> Well, this last part makes some sense to me, but not so much why the
> single notes are not transferred inside the chord including their
> properties like ties
Articulations and ties not written _inside_ of a chord do not belong to
"single notes". They belong to a moment in time.
> when single-note voices are combined to one.
>
> I feel like saying similar things like Simon and I probably will hear
> the same answer as you gave before :)
Perhaps try understanding it then. If you want more than juxtaposition
of stuff happening at the same point of time, don't use << >> but try
employing \partcombine. \partcombine will do things like combine
redundant per-chord articulations.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
