Hi, > I like this a lot and I feel like I've seen this exact discussion > before, but it didn't result in any core changes.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00908.html > Dev Team, > > Any reason \arpeggioArrowUp and \arpeggioArrowDown can't be defined this > way from the beginning? Is there a use-case where the "\arpeggioArrowUp > <c c' e> \arpeggio" way is necessary? I think at first it was just a property that could be set with an override. Then this was put into a command for convenience http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/grand-predefined-command-thread-td109680.html#a109692 However, the names \arpeggioUp and \arpeggioDown are still free and would me much more lilypondish. Best, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
