Hi Simon, Am 24.02.2016 um 21:50 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 23.02.2016 22:22, Noeck wrote: >> the names \arpeggioUp and \arpeggioDown are still free and >> would me much more lilypondish. > > More imprecise, really. It’s really only the direction of the arrow > that’s changed, not the direction of the whole grob.
Well the rest of the grob is invariant to rotations so you can't really tell ;) While this is true for the current \arpeggioArrowUp and Down commands, the proposed tweaked arpeggios would need names like \arpeggioWithArrowUp and \arpeggioWithArrowDown to be really precise. If you insist on the distinction from things like \slurUp \slurDown, a comparable situation could be \upbow \downbow. So how about \uparpeggio \downarpeggio? My term 'lilypondish' was not related to the name but to the fact that the tweaked arpeggios are written as postfix and do not need to surround the note. Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
