David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > James <[email protected]> writes: > >> David >> >> On 24/05/16 18:20, David Kastrup wrote: >>> James Lowe <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> No core file was generated, I also upped the ulimit to 1GB. >>>> >>>> So perhaps it isn't the type of 'assertion' or crash you thought it >>>> was after all? >>> Perhaps. Knut's problem, however, sounded like it. If you have >>> different results from Knut, things are even muddier than I thought. >>> >> Just in case it isn't obvious :) >> >> Your checkin stuck in staging is because patchy-staging-merge cannot >> complete the make doc so it won't push to staging, not because there >> is necessarily anything wrong with your patch. > > I'll run one of my own. It's a nuisance that our results differ. Wait: > my patchy runs with --enable-checking instead of --disable-optimising > because I have the following patch applied:
[...] > I'll revert this patch at my end and see whether I get anywhere > different. > > Knut, did you use any options to ./configure ? config.log should > mention how configure was called. Soooo. This took longer than I thought because I hibernated the laptop (Doh!) before going to sleep. It completed in the morning. How-e-ver: staging had already been pushed to master previously by someone else. Did someone test manually? Or do other patchies not fail in the manner Knut's setup does? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
