James Lowe <[email protected]> writes: > OK I'll give that a go and roll back to the commit just before all the > 4842/* ones - in case I cannot just roll back to before the 4842/6 and > not break something dependent in the other 4842 changes.
All of the commits should compile fine (or I'd have put them in a branch of their own). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
