Am 16.12.2016 um 17:38 schrieb Alexander Kobel: > [2] Side Note: other proposed names for minimum-length so far: > > (1) minimum-space > (2) show-length > (3) hide-below-length > (4) hide-if-shorter-than > (5) minimum-visibility > (6) visibility-threshold > (7) printing-threshold > (8) extender-threshold
At a first glance, the property is still the same, just the behaviour for shorter extenders changed: before: shorter extenders are prolonged after: shorter extenders are not visible But at a second glance, the minimum-length for LilyPond grobs usually means that the object is visible and the length is at least minimum-length (for glissandi, etc.). Using it to hide a shorter object feels inconsistent, IMHO. So I agree with Werner. But I have no favourite naming, all of them sound wrong to me - a slight preference for (6). Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
