>> (1) minimum-space
>> (2) show-length
>> (3) hide-below-length
>> (4) hide-if-shorter-than
>> (5) minimum-visibility
>> (6) visibility-threshold
>> (7) printing-threshold
>> (8) extender-threshold
>
> At a first glance, the property is still the same, just the
> behaviour for shorter extenders changed:
>
> before: shorter extenders are prolonged
> after: shorter extenders are not visible
>
> But at a second glance, the minimum-length for LilyPond grobs
> usually means that the object is visible and the length is at least
> minimum-length (for glissandi, etc.). Using it to hide a shorter
> object feels inconsistent, IMHO. So I agree with Werner. But I
> have no favourite naming, all of them sound wrong to me - a slight
> preference for (6).
What about `length-threshold'?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
