Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 14:01, Federico Bruni
<[email protected]> ha scritto:
Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 3:10, Karlin High
<[email protected]> ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Carl Sorensen <[email protected]>
wrote:
[...]
somehow this patch needs to be coordinated with Federico,
rather than using the standard LilyPond patch sequence.
That's what I gathered, too. I assumed Federico follows this list.
The
discussion had
stopped with the question of how to instruct new developers to get
the fonts,
and I debated whether to continue it here,
or on the Sourceforge or Rietveld issues.
Hi Karlin
In my opinion these fonts should be provided by linux distros.
I've just read that a new package urw-base35-fonts will replace the
obsolete urw-fonts in Fedora 27 (which should be released in
November):
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/urw-base35-fonts-20170801-1.fc27
Upstream repository is:
https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts
I'm testing a new container based on Fedora 27, where urw-base35-fonts
is installed.
However, I'm still getting the configure error because it seems that
lilypond need the .otf files and this package contains only *.t1 and
*.afm files:
# ls /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35
C059-BdIta.afm NimbusRoman-Regular.afm
P052-Roman.afm
C059-BdIta.t1 NimbusRoman-Regular.t1
P052-Roman.t1
C059-Bold.afm NimbusSans-Bold.afm
StandardSymbolsPS.afm
C059-Bold.t1 NimbusSans-Bold.t1
StandardSymbolsPS.t1
C059-Italic.afm NimbusSans-BoldItalic.afm
URWBookman-Demi.afm
C059-Italic.t1 NimbusSans-BoldItalic.t1
URWBookman-Demi.t1
C059-Roman.afm NimbusSans-Italic.afm
URWBookman-DemiItalic.afm
C059-Roman.t1 NimbusSans-Italic.t1
URWBookman-DemiItalic.t1
D050000L.afm NimbusSans-Regular.afm
URWBookman-Light.afm
D050000L.t1 NimbusSans-Regular.t1
URWBookman-Light.t1
NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.afm
URWBookman-LightItalic.afm
NimbusMonoPS-Bold.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.t1
URWBookman-LightItalic.t1
NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.afm
URWGothic-Book.afm
NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.t1
URWGothic-Book.t1
NimbusMonoPS-Italic.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.afm
URWGothic-BookOblique.afm
NimbusMonoPS-Italic.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.t1
URWGothic-BookOblique.t1
NimbusMonoPS-Regular.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.afm
URWGothic-Demi.afm
NimbusMonoPS-Regular.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.t1
URWGothic-Demi.t1
NimbusRoman-Bold.afm P052-Bold.afm
URWGothic-DemiOblique.afm
NimbusRoman-Bold.t1 P052-Bold.t1
URWGothic-DemiOblique.t1
NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.afm P052-BoldItalic.afm
Z003-MediumItalic.afm
NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.t1 P052-BoldItalic.t1
Z003-MediumItalic.t1
NimbusRoman-Italic.afm P052-Italic.afm fonts.dir
NimbusRoman-Italic.t1 P052-Italic.t1
What would you recommend to do? (question open to all the fonts guru in
this list...)
There's an open issue to document this in the CG:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4998/
Thanks
Federico
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
