Hello, On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:51:47 +0900 (JST), Masamichi Hosoda <truer...@trueroad.jp> wrote:
> >>>> [... replacing] 2.12.6 [... with] 2.12.93 indeed provides ~100x > >>>> improvement and builds the cache on my system in 600ms. > >>> > > > >>> This was a report of using fontconfig on Windows, IIRC. So my > >>> question: Does the Windows tarball of lilypond contain a recent > >>> fontconfig version? > >> > >> According to > >> https://github.com/gperciva/gub/blob/master/gub/specs/fontconfig.py > >> it's 2.12.1. > > > > Should we upgrade? Masamichi-san? > > For LilyPond 2.21, we should upgrade fontconfig, in my humble opinion. > But, for LilyPond 2.20, I'm wondering whether we should upgrade or not. > > If I understand correctly, the new fontconfig has significant changes. > I created https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5287/ so this thread doesn't get forgotten about. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
