On 04/06/18 17:58, David Kastrup wrote: >> Looking at GitLab's features, their "labels" for status tracking, >> > single-checkbox "squash merge" setting, and "resolvable discussions" >> > would at least have a chance of meeting those expectations.
> Frankly, I'd expect most systems to work better than our current split > between SourceForge as an issue tracker and Rietveld (a > Subversion-centric platform) for git commit reviews. > LibreOffice uses gerrit, but I get the impression that's not that user friendly. And LO has the resources to put in to ironing out at least some of the rough edges. Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
