> Le 8 mars 2019 à 19:14, Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> a écrit : > > >> On 8 Mar 2019, at 15:42, Karlin High <karlinh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 3/8/2019 8:31 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >>> So, my vote would be to try to do a Darwin-only version of Lilypond, and >>> position Frescobaldi as the "default editor" for Mac users. >> >> Would MacPorts installation be adequate for LilyPond? Hans Åberg reports >> success with this. Or is it important to have something available from >> lilypond.org? > > I would be good if more people try the MacPorts installation. > > The lilypond-devel version lists gcc8 as a library dependency, so that speaks > for it, rather than trying to use XCode clang, which is not the real one, but > an Apple inhouse version of unknown relation to the real one, and I recall > you had some problems with getting it to compile with clang. The one you use > now I think is gcc4.2, which is the last real gcc that Apple had, in later > versions, this name defaults to clang. > > I think too that it might be better to switch to say Frescobaldi as the > official LilyPond editor if you need one, though I haven't used it. Their > site is only in Dutch from what I could see, which might be a turnoff. >
The English version link at the bottom left leads to a 404. JM _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
