On 2019/12/14 10:18:33, hahnjo wrote:
Fabulous, thanks for putting this together!
I don't want to get your enthusiasm up prematurely, but I think that the GUB GCC versions we need(?)/use for PowerPC might not be entirely great with C++11 though they'll likely support it when given explicitly on the command line. So extensive changes may require several rebases/merges/rewrites before we are ready to put them into mainline (we don't have a separate GUB for post-2.19 work). Or we just say "to heck with it" and just assume that we don't run across bad C++11 support. That being said, one obvious contender for C++11 might be the std::vector class which we still double currently, and I think part of the reason may be that the data() member function is not guaranteed to be present before C++11. Because of the merge/rebase thing, I don't know how much of a good idea it would be to tackle this now, but it's certainly something worth doing once we are all-in on C++11. https://codereview.appspot.com/553310045/
