Mike Solomon <m...@meeshkan.com> writes: > One procedural question: what are acceptance procedures for a PR like > this? There is good debate and a variety of opinions, but at a certain > point we will need to make a decision - do we implement the CoC or > not?
What does "implement" mean? > I doubt that any new arguments will emerge on either side. David has > made several good arguments against it, I would not call them "good" as much as "personal". > and while the points are valid, they don't outweigh IMO the potential > for it to improve the problem of low contribution volume and a > shrinking pool of developers. I'm also admittedly biased in that I > don't feel comfortable contributing unless there is a code of conduct > with clear steps for reporting violations and consequences for repeat > offenders, so I'm probably not the best person to make the final call. > > ~Mike > > -- David Kastrup
