Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > Am 5. Februar 2020 20:08:28 MEZ schrieb [email protected]: >>On 2020/02/05 18:17:25, c_sorensen wrote: >>> I recognize that Mike Solomon has a different opinion. I mean no >>disrespect to >>> Mike, Janek, Han-Wen, or any other member of the LilyPond team. I >>highly value >>> the team spirit of the LilyPond team. >> >>Well said. Here's the current tally as I understand it: >>For: Han-Wen, Janek, Mike, Urs, Werner >>Against: Carl, Dan, David K., Trevor >>Mixed: David N. > > I must say that I haven't actually expressed an opinion about it so > far, and I don't know which I have. > > I don't feel uncomfortable without and wouldn't mind adding it. > > OTOH openLilyLib owes its existence to a nonzero part to the fact that > I found it easier to do that than getting my ideas into LilyPond > itself. (Although this isn't actually a comment on the CoC issue).
That would be relevant regarding the Code of Conduct if fear of getting harrassed kept you from contributing the code to LilyPond. It would be marginally relevant if the use of development platforms was under consideration where accepting/providing a particular Code of Conduct was mandatory, and use of such a particular platform would have made working directly in the LilyPond repository more feasible. For what it's worth, I do think that the bulk of OpenLilyLib likely just is a better fit for keeping in a separate repository/project since changes in there do not need tight coordination with changes in LilyPond. -- David Kastrup
