Il giorno gio 6 feb 2020 alle 23:04, Carl Sorensen <[email protected]>
ha scritto:
I think that the presence (in the proposed CoC )of an enforcement
committee that has the power to sanction participants in response to
anonymous complaints is more than just a bit of prose. It's the
creation of a new structure that governs our community. It's the
structure I have concerns about, not the prose.
I'm thinking through the issues, and I don't know exactly where I
finally come down. But at this point, I think I would welcome a code
of conduct that expressed our aspirations to be open, friendly,
welcome to diversity; and opposed to harassment, bullying,
belittling, and other negative forms of communication. If the code
of conduct also proposed a mediation committee that would provide
support to people who were having trouble with the community (either
those who felt damaged by the negative communication or those who
were accused of negative communication), I think I could support
that. Having a committee that tries to smooth things over seems only
a positive.
I agree with you.
From what I've read so far, it's a matter of fact that some
developers/contributors were not aware of some "tensions" happened in
the past. We should try to find a way to raise the awareness and
discuss possible solutions before developers leave the project.
A mediation committee might be a way..
Even though my personal opinion is that the priority now is changing
the development workflow and tools.
