Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Harm, > > Fair points, all. > >> Again a big, big THANK YOU to Werner and all who made it possible!! > > +1!
Major seconded. >> Not going into details of the CoC-discussion, why not handle it as what it >> is: >> It's a patch. Review showed there are too many objections. Thus it >> should be set to 'needs work' or 'waiting'. >> Otoh, there are suggestions to replace this proposal. Why not focus on >> those proposals? > > Excellent suggestion. Unsurprisingly I am partial to that suggestion. -- David Kastrup My replies have a tendency to cause friction. To help mitigating damage, feel free to forward problematic posts to me adding a subject like "timeout 1d" (for a suggested timeout of 1 day) or "offensive".
