Am Samstag, den 08.02.2020, 17:52 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: > Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > > > Am Samstag, den 08.02.2020, 17:31 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: > > > Thomas Morley <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > > > P.S. that 'make test-baseline' failed, I'll need to investigate > > > > after > > > > sending this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > input/regression/display-lily-tests.ly:230:1: fatal error: Test > > > unequal: BUG. > > > in = \applyOutput Foo #(lambda (arg) (list)) > > > out = \applyOutput Foo ##f > > > > > > > > > \test ##[ \applyOutput Foo #(lambda (arg) (list)) #] > > > > > > > > > Not much of a surprise here: Guile-2 does not keep the source of > > > functions around in general. And Urs > > > > ? (is there another one around here?) > > Dan. Knowing my luck, now both will be offended. Sorry.
No, I'm not offended ;-) Urs > > > > turned warnings in that file into > > > errors so that they would not get overlooked. Which certainly is > > > sensible, but it means we need to think about what to do here.
