Hi,
I noticed that Tie, Slur, PhrasingSlur, RepeatTie and LaissezVibrerTie
can be annotated by
\override <curve> . annotation = "some-text"
{
\override Slur.font-size = 0
\override Tie.font-size = 0
\override PhrasingSlur.font-size = 0
\override RepeatTie.font-size = 0
\override LaissezVibrerTie.font-size = 0
\override Slur.annotation = "Slur"
\override Tie.annotation = "Tie"
\override PhrasingSlur.annotation = "PhrasingSlur"
\override RepeatTie.annotation = "RepeatTie"
\override LaissezVibrerTie.annotation = "LaissezVibrerTie"
b1( c')
b1\( c'\)
b~b
<b f'>~ <b f'>
b\repeatTie
b\laissezVibrer
}
Alas, the implementation is not consistent.
Tie is the only one having font-size set per default, Slur uses a
fallback value in slur.cc, the other miss `annoatation` and
`font-size`.
This leads to several programming errors if compiled with
-dcheck-internal-types:
programming error: Grob `Slur' has no interface for property `font-size'
Especially Tie.font-size is getting on my nerves if I code
custom-stencils for all sorts of curves.
I propose a clean up:
Add `annotation` and `font-size` to tie.cc, semi-tie.cc and slur.cc
(where missing)
Delete Tie.font-size in define-grobs.scm
Use the same fallback for Tie.font-size in tie.cc as it's done in slur.cc
Not sure why annotations for tie-like curves are placed and colored
differently, though, I don't intend to change this.
Would a patch along these lines be acceptable?
Thanks,
Harm
