Am Mo., 20. Juli 2020 um 12:04 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > I noticed that Tie, Slur, PhrasingSlur, RepeatTie and LaissezVibrerTie > can be annotated by > \override <curve> . annotation = "some-text" > > { > \override Slur.font-size = 0 > \override Tie.font-size = 0 > \override PhrasingSlur.font-size = 0 > \override RepeatTie.font-size = 0 > \override LaissezVibrerTie.font-size = 0 > > \override Slur.annotation = "Slur" > \override Tie.annotation = "Tie" > \override PhrasingSlur.annotation = "PhrasingSlur" > \override RepeatTie.annotation = "RepeatTie" > \override LaissezVibrerTie.annotation = "LaissezVibrerTie" > > b1( c') > b1\( c'\) > b~b > <b f'>~ <b f'> > b\repeatTie > b\laissezVibrer > } > > Alas, the implementation is not consistent. > Tie is the only one having font-size set per default, Slur uses a > fallback value in slur.cc, the other miss `annoatation` and > `font-size`. > This leads to several programming errors if compiled with > -dcheck-internal-types: > programming error: Grob `Slur' has no interface for property `font-size' > > Especially Tie.font-size is getting on my nerves if I code > custom-stencils for all sorts of curves. > > I propose a clean up: > Add `annotation` and `font-size` to tie.cc, semi-tie.cc and slur.cc > (where missing) > Delete Tie.font-size in define-grobs.scm > Use the same fallback for Tie.font-size in tie.cc as it's done in slur.cc > > Not sure why annotations for tie-like curves are placed and colored > differently, though, I don't intend to change this. > > Would a patch along these lines be acceptable? > > > Thanks, > Harm
No objection so far, thus: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/264 Cheers, Harm
