On Apr 21, 2022, at 02:55, Luca Fascione <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'd think you can up this by one, and get a cleaner looking piece of code
> if you implement scm_dynwind_fluid() as a forwarded method on your context:
...
> dwc.fluid (fluid2, value2);
Here's something that does bother me. That reads as if dwc holds state
affecting the outcome, which is untrue.
{
Dynwind_context dwc;
// . . .
{
Dynwind_context dwc2;
// . . .
dwc.free (p); // not what it seems
// . . .
}
}
The scm_ functions operate implicitly on the current context. Dressing them
differently would be confusing.
—
Dan
