On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 6:55 AM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Freeman Gilmore <freeman.gilm...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:58 PM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> Freeman Gilmore <freeman.gilm...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > Is there going to be a non binary version for windows coming soon? > >> > >> The source code is the same independent of operating system, so you > >> apparently don't mean "source code" when you say "non binary". What > >> would your expectations of a "non binary version for windows" be? > >> > > Ok i see it now, but this was my problem. I know that the source code > > (binary) is usually the same for all but I have never worked with > > source code for LilyPond so when I read this, "Documentation writers > > and testers will generally want to download the latest binary:" with 5 > > binaries listed below, *Note, the colon should be a period;* and make > > it look like it is not the header for a listing. I may not b the only > > dummy out there!. > > I don't understand what you are saying here and you write things like > "source code (binary)"
I worded this wrong. I should have just used the word binaries. I was mixing the two, disregarding Source code. I do know the difference. I was looking for a program for windows. Not being a programmer the header sentence says to use one of the following binaries{ at least that is how I read it. So i was asking when the programs would be listed, not understanding that this was thmn and not binaries. I have what I need now so no need to go any further with this.. Thank you for your help with this, ƒg > that make pretty clear that we are still talking i > about entirely different things. So I repeat my question: what would > your expectations of a "non binary version for windows" be? > > -- > David Kastrup >