On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 11:45 +0000, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Currently homebrew provides Lilypond 2.22.2 for Apple Silicon, > > > that is what I am using. > > > > Did you try running the x86_64 binaries via Apple's Rosetta tool? > > That might be a bit slower than native executables, but given that > > Homebrew builds 2.22.2 without Guile bytecode, it might actually be > > comparable. > > Note that the MacPorts port of LilyPond 2.22.2 already uses Guile 2.2 > bytecode and provides a binary for Apple Silicon, too. > > https://ports.macports.org/port/lilypond/details/
No, the 2.22.2 version uses Guile 1.8 as can be easily seen from the dependencies. Even if it used Guile 2.2 as Homebrew does, it cannot use Guile bytecode because that is fundamentally not possible with stable/2.22. Please don't spread wrong information. The lilypond-devel port, currently at version 2.23.7, uses Guile 2.2 with bytecode. That *may* be an alternative.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
