> On 14 Jan 2023, at 08:06, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > >>> Too bad that `makam.ly` is essentially undocumented... >> >> From what I can see, makam.ly is the original faulty file, only >> there for backwards compatibility, which might be removed if there >> is no need for that. > > We could make it become deprecated in the next release, to be > completely removed in the release after.
If there are no compatibility issues, perhaps turkish-makam.ly <http://turkish-makam.ly/> might be renamed makam.ly <http://makam.ly/>. Adam Good might give his view.
