On Jul 9, 2023, at 10:39, Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> wrote: > > It definitely makes sense to keep the option to build without bytecode, since > that is quite faster for incremental rebuilds (especially in Guile 2.2,
I think it makes sense to skip `make bytecode` when iterating on particular tests, but I always `make bytecode` before `make check` because `bytecode` requires 15s and shortens `check` by 60s. I don't know whether that is typical, but I wouldn't mind having `make` compile the bytecode for me in the case of `check` and `doc` targets. — Dan
