Hi Werner, Am 12.05.26 um 06:27 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
1) It seems to me it would be reasonable to change the meaning of the glyph-name property for NoteHead grobs such that it *always* (as long as we use the default stencil routines) carries the actual glyph name in the font. I'm aware that this might potentially break user code, but in its current state, the glyph-name property for NoteHeads is probably not terribly useful, and its meaning contradicts the explanation in the internals reference. ("The glyph name within the font. In the context of (span) bar lines, glyph-name represents a processed form of glyph, where decisions about line breaking, etc., are already taken.")Agreed. Please file an issue. :-)
Thanks! https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/work_items/6935 Lukas
