> On Apr 24, 2015, at 6:43 AM, Federico Bruni <fedel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You forgot the quality of sheets: a (really) digital PDF will always look > better than a scanned PDF. > And if it's too old or don't like anything you can change it and get what you > want.
+1 Also, ultimately do we want the archive of public domain musical works to be available as inflexible scans or as flexible music data? (Ask anyone working in digital humanities…) > This is the value of Mutopia and the reason why I strongly disagree on the > idea of merging it into IMSLP. In the past discussion on this topic there > were a couple of ideas on better integration between the two projects. I agree. Ultimately, Mutopia isn’t going away, and it is (and will continue to be) associated with LilyPond. Sure, it’s easy to disparage it for this or that, but I think it’s a valuable resource that’s worth maintaining and improving. I benefit from it and so I contribute back a little of my time updating old works, improving their quality. Cheers, -Paul
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
