I think the question is more: “will machines be able to engrave scores that don’t need tweaks or human correction at all.” Maybe, but in my opinion — except if you implement something like an AI — it will never have the difference that makes traditional engraving so lovely (everything is not perfectly aligned and straight, whatever).
Yours, Calixte 2015-04-24 23:39 GMT+02:00 Gilles <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:22:54 +0200, Eyolf Østrem wrote: > >> On 24.04.2015 (14:12), tyronicus wrote: >> >>> Simon Albrecht-2 wrote >>> > I should’ve written “I believe that nothing as beautiful/good as this >>> > will ever be engraved by a machine” then, since basically it is my >>> > belief. Maybe I exaggerated a little :-) >>> > And you may believe differently of course. >>> >>> My contrary belief: A machine will draw a circle better than a human >>> 100% of >>> the time. It's a matter of telling it how. >>> >> >> A machine may draw a more geometrically perfect circle, but if I were to >> hang the drawing on my wall, I'd much rather have one made by Mirò than >> by a >> machine. Same with notation. >> > > Following this line of reasoning, you'll end up that it's better > to have scores written by hand (as a really unique artisanal > creation)... > > Also, a machine can be told to not draw a perfect circle, to fool > you into thinking that was not drawn by machine. ;-) > > Regards, > Gilles > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
