Am 23. Juli 2015 19:29:38 MESZ, schrieb Malte Meyn <[email protected]>: > > >Am 23.07.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Christopher R. Maden: >> They will look different, but will be the same notes. The music >> describes itself; the key signature affects presentation.[*] >> >That’s true and I think that this is one of LilyPonds strengths as it >allows to be very flexible with transposing, quoting, changing key >signatures etc.
I think so too. However, there *are* programs/formats that "think" differently. I know of Amadeus an midt notably MEI where you basically write diwn what you *see*. If not explicitly altered the actual pitch is determined by the key signature. > >By the way, how would one write a g natural in b major, if ‘g’ lead to >a >g sharp? ‘ges’? But if so, how to write a ges? No, a g natural would be encided as a g natural, however the syntax is. E.g. gn. Users of these systems are very convinced of it - as are we ... Ur > >P.S.: There is a very ugly hack abusing modalTranspose to achieve >something similar so that b c d e f becomes b cis dis e fis. But it >breaks when you want to use pitches other than those from the original >b >major scale like above. > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
