Today, I found this snippet:

http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=872


+-[ Gergely Kontra <pihent...@gmail.com> ]------------------+
|                                                           |
| Mobile:(+36 20)356 9656                                   |
|                                                           |
+- "Olyan lángész vagyok, hogy poroltóval kellene járnom!" -+

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:58 PM, tisimst <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Wols Lists [via Lilypond] <[hidden
> email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=178206&i=0>> wrote:
>
>> On 24/06/15 18:42, Paul Scott wrote:
>> >> Because in individual part score, it will look silly (alternative
>> endings,
>> >> > but they are identical)
>>
>> > Not silly at all.  It lets the violists know the structure.  What if
>> the
>> > conductor says "Start at the 2nd ending?"  How will the violist(s) know
>> > where to start if they don't where the 2nd ending is?
>>
>> But no alternative implies ALL parts are the same. Once you're away from
>> melody instruments, I would have thought identical repeats was a common
>> occurrence across pretty much al parts - who's never had a section of
>> rests?
>>
>> I'd agree with that other lister - different structures for different
>> parts causes no end of confusion - especially when all the conductor has
>> is the solo cornet part ... :-)
>>
>
> Last thing I'm going to say on this: It's a really good idea to make the
> score repeat structures the same for clarity and minimal confusion. It will
> pay off because the musicians see what the conductor sees. That's what
> makes most sense to me. Anyone can agree or disagree, but I don't think
> there's any point deliberating over this any more.
>
> There. I've said it. ;-) Happy engraving!
> - Abraham
>
> ------------------------------
> View this message in context: Re: volta repeat with and without
> alternative ending
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/volta-repeat-with-and-without-alternative-ending-tp178153p178206.html>
> Sent from the User mailing list archive
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html> at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to