Blöchl Bernhard <[email protected]> writes: > with > "That even works with \version "2.12.3"." > I just reference to the original code under question. It obviously > used lilypond > \version "2.12.3"
But it's a bad idea to tack on a version header referring to a version with which the file won't work. For one thing, if people with an older version of LilyPond try running the code, they'll get mysterious error messages without being advised about the version mismatch. For another, when convert-ly is being run on the file, it might make a hash of it because it assumes a much older syntax than there actually is and "upgrades" it. So there is no point in leaving a \version "2.12.3" at the top of the file while at the same time updating its syntax to that of 2.18.2 (or in this case probably 2.16.0 if nothing else is in there requiring a newer version). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
