Andrew Bernard <[email protected]> writes: > <[email protected] on behalf of > [email protected]> wrote: >> >>If all else fails, the lilypond binary itself can serve as a GUILE >>interpreter. > > That was the general idea. I posted some instructions about how to add > the utility to a lilypond installation for people but in a new > thread. It was actually one of the main reasons I did it in Scheme - > there would be a guaranteed known execution environment installed if > the user is using lilypond to begin with.
It's not just that. It's also that the lilypond executable is pretty sure to know the search paths of LilyPond. You cannot really get them reliably without calling LilyPond, and if you do that anyway, why not use its interpreter? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
