Andrew Bernard <[email protected]> writes: >> On 25/08/2015 18:11, "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> It's not just that. It's also that the lilypond executable is pretty >> sure to know the search paths of LilyPond. You cannot really get them >> reliably without calling LilyPond, and if you do that anyway, why not >> use its interpreter? > > I am not sure I understand. Is having a symlink: > > flatten-ly -> /home/username/bin/lilypond-wrapper.guile > > not correct?
I can't say anything about the wrappers used here. I was pointing out that calling a Scheme procedure via the lilypond executable has the advantage of having search paths etc set correctly. You can do that with lilypond -e '(load "xxx.scm")' -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
