Ok, the issue is now reported in the bug-lilypond list. I originally
bumped into the issue while trying to engrave "Pavane de la Belle au bois
dormant" from Ravel's La Mere de l'Oye. I have attached a scanned snippet
from the score. Is there a way I can reproduce this, and avoid the bug
that I reported?
MT
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Phil Holmes wrote:
%%%%
\version "2.19.25"
\relative {
d''-.( d-. d-. d-.)
d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
d--( d-- d-- d--)
d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
d->( d-> d-> d->)
\break
\override Slur.outside-staff-priority = #500
d-.( d-. d-. d-.)
d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
d--( d-- d-- d--)
d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
d->( d-> d-> d->)
}
%%%%
Why are the articulations in bars 2, 7, 9, 14 treated differently? It seems
they are aligned with the slurs instead of the notes. Should I forward this
to bug-lilypond?
I would say so. you might like to add this to the bottom of your example:
\break
\override Script.outside-staff-priority = #1000
d-.( d-. d-. d-.)
d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
d--( d-- d-- d--)
d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
d->( d-> d-> d->)
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
