On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:02:06 +0200 David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On paper, we all write Am to designate an A-minor chord. However, in > > LilyPond we write a:min. > Probably because it is usually written as a:m instead. "m" and "min" > are aliases. True, although that was not what I intended to state. See below. > > So what is the big deal to write c:sus4 when you want to designate > > your flavour of Csus? > > Well, your premise is faulty, so it's not really relevant for the c:sus > interpretation. The point that I wanted to make was that you need to write chords differently in LilyPond anyway, using colons and periods. So translating c:sus into c:sus4 would hardly make sense. OTOH, a full translation of Am into a:m (and so on) would be interesting. -- Johan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
