2015-09-20 14:14 GMT+02:00 BB <[email protected]>: > I absolutely agree! I did not understand as I read that Lilypond now > supports misbehavour of some lazy people with reduced harmonic skills. > > There are a bunch of "coloured" sus chords, not just sus4 for every sus > sign.
No idea if anyone tested my recent proposal, seems not. >From the user's point of view it simply aliases c:sus to c:sus4 and c:5 to c:1.5 or c^3 no other sus is changed or impossible to use, c:5 will only work if the 5 is the one and only modifier, hence no other stuff is concerned. If it turns out that my low tested proposal doesn't warrant this, it needs more work, ofc. Though, I really don't understand why people don't test and give feedback. Instead more and more mails cumulate. -Harm P.S. David announced an own patch. I'm quite confident he will do better work than me. > > On 20.09.2015 13:38, Johan Vromans wrote: >> >> So what is the big deal to write c:sus4 when you want to designate your >> flavour of Csus? > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
