Hi! No one played with positions of \sustainOn and \sustainOff?
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Przemyslaw Pawelczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a problem with \sustainOn and \sustainOff colliding each other > in some cases. > I use following pattern > > s32*31\sustainOn s32\sustainOff [...] > but it often looks bad on the paper. You can see the problem below: http://paste.przemoc.net/lilypond/piano-pedal-mark-collision/piano-pedal-mark-collision.pdf http://paste.przemoc.net/lilypond/piano-pedal-mark-collision/piano-pedal-mark-collision.ly BTW Isn't it a bug that those collisions happen at all? > > Is there any way to improve it globally? > Is there any way to fine tune horizontal position of the pedal indication? I came up with: \override SustainPedal.X-offset = -1 which improves the situation globally, but doesn't avoid collisions in case of denser pedaling like: s32*15\sustainOn s32\sustainOff s32*15\sustainOn s32\sustainOff I can mitigate such issues by correcting X-offset manually then, e.g.: \once \override SustainPedal.X-offset = -2 (finding value looking appropriately in the context is trial and error process, though) If there is any smarter way, then I will replace it instantly. Example of above workarounds: http://paste.przemoc.net/lilypond/piano-pedal-mark-collision/piano-pedal-mark-collision-workaround.pdf http://paste.przemoc.net/lilypond/piano-pedal-mark-collision/piano-pedal-mark-collision-workaround.ly > > Or maybe there is even a way to use some Scheme magic that would allow > writing simpler form (s1\sustainOff\sustainOn), yet modifying it for > MIDI (changing off placement by given duration, 32 in the example)? This would be super handy. Regards. -- Przemyslaw Pawelczyk Cross-site thinker, rookie composer, Linux apprentice https://soundcloud.com/przemoc86 _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
