Am 15.03.2016 um 10:58 schrieb Trevor Daniels: >> So, before integrating that into my code I would collect opinions. Are >> > there any strong (and reasoned) objections against changing the default >> > here? > I agree we should switch the default, as long as it is clearly stated in > Changes, perhaps under a heading New Default(s).
This is a good idea. I assume there will be a few more changed defaults in the whole corpus of that patch that should be mentioned as well. In addition I *consider* also rewriting the manual chapter a little bit, mainly to include the beaming pattern considerations in the main text (instead of only having them in "selected snippets"). But for that to happen I will have to complete the work. And for that to happen I will first have to pick up working on it ... Urs _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
