On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Urs Liska <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Am 15.03.2016 um 10:58 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > >> So, before integrating that into my code I would collect opinions. Are > >> > there any strong (and reasoned) objections against changing the > default > >> > here? > > I agree we should switch the default, as long as it is clearly stated in > > Changes, perhaps under a heading New Default(s). > > This is a good idea. I assume there will be a few more changed defaults > in the whole corpus of that patch that should be mentioned as well. > In addition I *consider* also rewriting the manual chapter a little bit, > mainly to include the beaming pattern considerations in the main text > (instead of only having them in "selected snippets"). But for that to > happen I will have to complete the work. And for that to happen I will > first have to pick up working on it ... > > Urs > My 2 cents - this sounds good to me, as well, Urs. Thanks again for all your work on LilyPond. Thanks again to you, David, Trevor, and Werner, as well. Ralph -- Ralph Palmer Brattleboro, VT USA [email protected]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
