Am 17. April 2016 10:51:34 MESZ, schrieb David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > >> Am 17. April 2016 08:20:52 MESZ, schrieb David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >> >>>A warning is appropriate for something which is not an error: namely >>>LilyPond has a well-specified task but the results will not likely >>>make sense. LilyPond does not return an error code for a warning. >> >> Well, then let LilyPond report an error when it encounters one. But >> only then a "fatal" one when it actually forces LilyPond to stop. > >For any _correct_ input, LilyPond is eventually forced to stop.
This is the point where I have to say you are talking bullshit, deliberately (?) and arbitrarily flipping around everyone's words and intentions. It doesn't make sense to continue with that thread. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
