On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Urs Liska wrote: > No, of course not. If LilyPond is able to "recover" (as Andrew put it) it > should of course do so. But it should not report a "fatal error" and a > "failed file" then.
I think the whole thing comes down to something very simple which ought to go without saying, but evidently needs to be said after all: Lilypond should not lie. -- Matthew Skala [email protected] People before principles. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
